Spotify Arrives in Canada: Is It Better or Worse than Rdio?

August 21, 2014   Comments

By Allan Pulga

Let’s be straight here. When I got an email invite to a free one-month trial of Spotify last week, I was excited. But I wasn’t approaching it with a clear head. I’ve been a happy Rdio user since July 2013.

Rdio was the first online music streaming service of its kind to arrive in Canada (we still don’t have iTunes Radio, Beats Music or Pandora; Google Play Music launched here May of this year) and as my colleague Alexander James aptly put it, Rdio has been a game changer for Canadian music lovers.

Spotify is a welcome addition to a (delayed but) growing music streaming market in Canada.

Spotify’s arrival to Canada is welcome news because more competition is good for the consumer, right? Founded in Sweden in 2008, it has over 40 million users (10 million paid subscribers) – Spotify is the world leader in music streaming. Rdio was also born in Sweden, launched in 2010 by Skype founders Niklas Zennström and Janus Friis. Rdio, however, is a little cryptic about its user base totals (in a February CNET article, Rdio CEO Anthony Bay completely dodges the user base question). Nevertheless, late last year, Rdio reported service in 51 countries (at the time, Spotify was serving 32 countries), but Rdio still did not report a global user total.

Spotify vs. Rdio by the numbers:





20 million songs

20 million songs


320 Kbps

192 Kbps


Android, BlackBerry, iOS, OS X, Windows

Android, BlackBerry, iOS, OS X, Web, Windows



$5/mo., $10/mo. mobile, $18/mo. family

Source: Time, March 2014

In the above Time article, author Matt Peckham says Spotify’s desktop interface "could do with a radical overhaul,” while noting Rdio offers "one of the friendliest interfaces of the bunch.” After comparing both for the past week I would 100% agree. But before we get to UI…

Catalog, Sound Quality and Bitrate: Equal

Because the library sizes between Spotify and Rdio are identical*, and upon testing both the desktop and mobile sound quality of each app (they sounded identical as well), the only difference in this category appears to be bitrate.

*Nearly every song/album I found on Spotify was also available on Rdio. One exception being The Beatles, which have 17 albums on Rdio (6 of interviews only) and 1 single, and 3 albums 2 singles on Spotify. A couple albums I searched (Bonobo - Dial M For Monkey and Meek Mill - The Wolverine) weren’t available on either. One single (Alt-J - Every Other Freckle) arrived on Spotify Aug. 13; it arrived on Rdio Aug. 14.

My testing was limited to desktop/mobile Wi-Fi use and 3G or 4G coverage on my iPhone 5s and although Spotify advertises a much higher bitrate, I noticed no difference in streaming performance.

Discovering New Music: +1 Spotify

In its "Browse” section, Spotify has "Genres & Moods” you can choose from for streaming options. Types include: Mood, Party, Pop, Workout, Focus, Rock, Chill, Club, Dinner, Sleep, Urban… 23 in total (see above photo). Within each of these categories are a seemingly infinite number of playlists to choose from (many of which tens of thousands of followers).

This is a great way to discover new music. And it works like Songza in that you just pick a mood and it plays you music. You don’t need to know what you’d like to listen to before you launch the app. Rdio does nothing of the sort. While Rdio does allow you to play "Stations” based on a given artist, genre or a user’s history, it does not curate based on mood.

Spotify is better than Rdio for discovering new music, but its UI needs work.

My friend Beth is an avid Songza user and has been trying Spotify this past week as well. She says an advantage over Songza is that Spotify lets you navigate back to a song you like, even if you accidentally skip forward.

Spotify is by no means perfect, however. In "New Releases,” for example, Spotify does not indicate the number of songs on an album, so you can’t differentiate between singles and albums. Rdio lists the number of songs. Rdio also lets you drill down in "New Releases” by Overview/This Week/Last Week/Two Weeks Ago. Spotify does not.

Even when you click through to an album/single in Spotify, it only lists the year it was released, not the date. Rdio lists the date, which makes it easier to identify just how new something is. Also, when you go to an artist’s page, Spotify does show you "Latest Release” and lists the release date. When you click through, however, it only shows the release year. Lame. "This would drive hipsters crazy,” a buddy of mine noted. It would.

Desktop UI and Web Access: +1 Rdio

As Time’s Matt Peckham pointed out (see above table), Rdio has a web app. Spotify does not (see below screenshot**). Spotify’s desktop app must be installed to whichever computer you plan to use it on. Rdio, on the other hand, lets you log in via your browser, so it’s more convenient that way.

**To be fair, I’ve been using Spotify on a Canadian pre-launch trial, so perhaps the web app is still on its way.

Correction (Aug. 22): The Spotify web app is indeed accessible from Canada. Although the site says Spotify hasn't yet launched in Canada (see below screenshot), pre-launch users are able to log in by entering their username and password.



Spotify web app in Canada

Spotify’s background is all black and Rdio’s is all white. I don’t have a preference either way, but it’s funny how they’re at opposite ends of the spectrum.

What I do have a preference for is explicit versions of songs and Rdio does a better job of indicating them, with a red E in a red box. Spotify doesn’t typically indicate the explicit version, rather the clean version is labeled "edited.”

When you look up an artist on Rdio, it lets you view Albums/Songs/Biography/Related Artists. Spotify lets you view Overview/Related Artists/Biography – to see albums, you have to scroll down in Overview (see above photo). You can view them by album cover or by full track lists. Spotify also isolates Singles versus Albums. Rdio just lists all (Singles or Albums) as Albums, which is annoying – you have to note there’s only one song on an album to know it’s a single. Interestingly, artist biographies are the same on both Spotify and Rdio. Overall though, Rdio’s "Artist” listings are more user friendly (shown below).

A nice feature in Rdio is "Autoplay,” which plays a song similar to what you were listening to when the previous song ends. To my knowledge, Spotify does not autoplay you anything when the album/single/playlist you’re listening to finishes. The song ends. Silence. Feels like a missed opportunity on Spotify’s part.

Simply put, Rdio offers a superior user experience, both on desktop and mobile.

Mobile UI: +1 Rdio

In this era of awesome phones with shitty batteries, it might be worth noting that the Spotify app has a black background versus Rdio’s all-white background – I didn’t test this, but I suspect it helps save battery life to a certain extent.

Another advantage to Spotify is it lets you access "Local Files” on both desktop and mobile, meaning you can play whatever music you have on your device (e.g. iTunes, Google Play, Windows Player, etc.) right in Spotify. For me, this was cool because playlists I’d created years ago in iTunes were automatically accessible within Spotify. In Rdio, for instance, I’d have to recreate them track by track.

Rdio vs Spotify - Sync to mobile

But here’s where Rdio’s mobile app design is superior, in my opinion: Syncing music to your mobile device. On Rdio, you indicate on the desktop app which music you want to sync to your mobile phone. On your phone (while connected to Wi-Fi, mind you), you select "Sync” from the app menu and it will upload the previously selected music to your phone, so you can access it in "Offline” mode (which reduces your mobile data use).

To sync music on the Spotify app, it requires an additional step. You "Save” music to "Your Music” on desktop. Then, on your mobile device (Spotify lets you sync via Wi-Fi and cellular), you have to find the albums/songs you want synced, open them and toggle them to "Available Offline.” This is a pretty annoying, manual process – particularly if you do it often (I do) to manage the amount of memory this music occupies on your phone.

The Rdio mobile app also wins in that you can switch from online to offline mode directly from the main menu (see "Go Offline” in the above photo). On Spotify, you have to go Settings > Playback > Offline Mode. I also switch between modes often, so this got tiresome really fast.

Social and Mobile Integrations: +1 Spotify

Spotify is definitely the frontrunner in this category, as it connects directly to Facebook. I fully acknowledge this may not be for everybody, but I thought it was pretty cool. (I will note that it is stupid that your Spotify user profile auto-populates your Facebook profile pic, so if you don’t connect it to Facebook, or if you’re not on Facebook, you don’t have a profile pic.) What is cool, though, is being able to find fellow Facebook friends within Spotify, follow them, see what they’re listening to, etc. On Rdio, you’re finding your friends from scratch.

Spotify has more 'extras' than Rdio, likely due to its larger user base creating more partnership opportunities.

One of my buddies in Vancouver converted from Rdio to Spotify because he prefers its mobile UI and also because of a feature that alerts of him upcoming local tour dates of artists he follows.

Shazam integrationRdio used to boast an exclusive integration with Shazam, which is great because you can Shazam a song and while in the app, select "Listen with Rdio” and jump straight to Rdio to hear it. Turns out Shazam previously connected to Spotify, removed the integration, and just last week brought it back (along with a Beats Music integration for U.S. users; see right photo).

Spotify also has a "Private Session” option while streaming, which is nice because my Rdio friends mocked me when they saw I was listening to En Vogue (it was only via Autoplay, I swear).

Support: +1 Rdio

This is just a one-off, but I emailed Rdio Support about a minor bug in their system (I couldn’t remove an album from my collection, for some reason). When the steps they outlined for me failed to resolve my issue (the album is still there), the rep I was dealing with emailed me saying, "I’m sorry this didn’t work for you. Please enjoy one free month of Rdio Unlimited on us to make up for this trouble. I just applied this month to your account, so listen away!” OK. That is just awesome.

Meanwhile, my friend Beth had an issue with Spotify via mobile: She was unable to upgrade from a basic trial to a premium trial on her Android phone ("Canada” does not appear from the drop-down list of countries – again, this may still be coming). Anyway, she sent an email to Spotify Support and the rep emailed her with tips (copy-and-pasted directly from the website’s FAQ section) telling her to ensure her user country and billing country match. She sent the rep screenshots showing that Canada was not an option via mobile. The rep then told her to simply upgrade while using the desktop app. And that was it.

The Verdict: Rdio Defeats Spotify 3-2

At the end of the day, both apps are pretty even and the slight edges I’ve reported are either anecdotal or a matter of preference. As I mentioned, I was on Rdio first and I can tell you: Learning a new music streaming interface is kind of a pain in the ass. 

That being said, I would recommend Rdio mostly because of its design. It’s more seamless and user friendly than Spotify, on both desktop and mobile device. By comparison, Spotify is less intuitive (making it harder to navigate) and clunky at times (e.g. extra step when syncing to mobile).

I will concede that Spotify is a better option for people that have a hard time deciding what they want to listen to. Its "Genres & Moods” feature is enough to tip the scale in its favor, especially for people already hooked on services like Songza.

Spotify is also a winner in terms of its ancillary services – things like local concert listings and its social/mobile integrations. There are simply more "extras” to Spotify, which are probably a result of its larger user base increasing its opportunities for partnership.

How about you? Have you tried both? Which do you prefer? Please post your comments below.



Motorola Making a Comeback?

August 19, 2014   Comments
Moto G - Source: TrustedReviews

By Allan Pulga

News last week of Motorola's profitable second quarter indicate promise for the embattled phone maker.

IDG News Service reported (Aug. 11) the company sold 8.6 million smartphones in Q2, up from 6.5 million in Q1, and more than double what it sold in Q2 2013. IDG said this growth was largely due to popularity of its Moto G (pictured above) and Moto E phones.

IDG also noted these sales numbers "pale in comparison with those of Apple and Samsung, which sold 35.2 million and 75 million phones last quarter, respectively." Nevertheless, Motorola's resurgence surprised industry analysts.

Also working in Motorola's favour: Rumours it is working with Google on a 5.9-inch Nexus phone. But wait, Google sold Motorola's mobile division to Lenovo, right? Don't worry. Lenovo is doing just fine in the mobile game too.


Android Feature: Lost Phone Calls Owner

August 19, 2014   Comments

By Allan Pulga

TechCrunch reported (Aug. 8) on an Android feature that prompts whomever finds your lost phone to call you right away.

"If you lose your phone, just head over to Google’s browser-based Android Device Manager," wrote TechCrunch's Greg Kumparak. "Tap the lock button, toss in a "Recovery Message” (read: a plea to whoever finds the phone to not be a jerk) and an unlock password, and add a phone number where you can be reached."

ZTE Grand X Arrives In Canada: Bell, Virgin

August 8, 2014   Comments

By Allan Pulga

CDN reported yesterday (Aug. 7) that Chinese phone maker ZTE has entered the Canadian mobile market with its Grand X Android smartphone.

The phone, which features a 5-inch HD display, a 5-megapixel camera and a 1.2 GHz quad core processor, is available through Bell or Virgin Mobile for $149 unlocked (or $0 on a 2-year contract)

The Verge Calls iPad Air 'Best Tablet You Can Buy'

August 7, 2014   Comments

Apple iPad Air - Source: The VergeBy Allan Pulga

Apple has apparently been bringing its A-game in terms of mobile devices lately: The Verge (Aug. 6) named its iPad Air "the best tablet you can buy."

This, just a couple months after it named the iPhone 5s "the best phone you can buy."

On the iPad Air, The Verge's Dan Seifert wrote:
"When everything is added up, the best tablet is Apple’s iPad Air. The fifth version of the tablet since Apple introduced the iPad in 2010, the iPad Air is extremely well built, exceptionally thin and lightweight (one pound exactly), and performs very well. Its battery easily lasts multiple days, its processor is very fast, and its high-resolution display is excellent. The screen is the No. 1 most important part of a tablet, and the Air’s is great for reading, while vibrant and colorful enough for video. There’s really nothing to complain about when it comes to the Air’s hardware."

Seifert gave the iPad Air a rating of 9.3.

He noted that it was basically a tie for first place, but put the iPad Mini as runner-up. Here are his Top 5 tablets:

  1. Apple iPad Air:   9.3   ($423-$500)
  2. Apple iPad Mini:   9.3   ($340-$400)
  3. Asus Nexus 7:   9.0   ($230)
  4. Microsoft Surface Pro 3:   8.0   ($757-$800)
  5. Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4:   7.8   ($400)

One thing about the Surface Pro 3 that jumped out at me was its price tag ($757-$800). Perhaps that has something to do with its abysmal sales performance to date.

BGR Crowns LG G3 'Android's New King'

July 25, 2014   Comments

By Allan Pulga

Yesterday, BGR's Zach Epstein reviewed the new LG G3, which released in the U.S. this month.

Epstein points out that the G3 is in a "nice window of opportunity" right now, with hype surrounding the springtime releases of the HTC One M8 and the Samsung Galaxy S5 tailing off, and with Apple's iPhone 6 release still a couple months away.

Some highlights from Epstein's review:

  • Display: The G3 is the first widely available smartphone with a quad HD (2K) display. "It's incredible," he says.
  • Software: "LG has done a nice job of adding value to Google’s Android 4.4 software without being overbearing, (unlike Samsung's TouchWiz software)." He acknowledges there is some carrier bloatware on the device, however.
  • Industrial Design and UI:  "LG’s decision to move the power/sleep and volume buttons to the back of the handset gives the phone a fantastic look from the front, but they’re not terribly comfortable or convenient to use despite claims made in LG’s marketing."
  • Camera: "Focusing the G3’s 13-megapixel shooter is lightning fast thanks to laser-assisted focus, and it captures photos and videos that are very clear and vivid. Edges are nice and smooth, and color reproduction is also impressive. The camera features optical image stabilization as well, to help prevent blurring."
  • Two complaints: 1) The phone is gorgeous and sleek, but "feels plasticky" compared to the HTC One M8 or the iPhone 5S. 2) The phone is too big, at 5.76 inches tall by 2.94 inches wide and 0.35 inches thick.
<< Older Posts

Popular News

Microsoft (4)

Canadian Wireless News

Bell (191)
Chatr (9)
Fido (80)
MiKe (11)
Mobilicity (32)
MTS (33)
Rogers (209)
Sasktel (43)
TELUS (183)
Videotron (26)

US Wireless News

AT&T (10)
Sprint (0)
T-Mobile (0)

Latest News for Manufacturers

BlackBerry (75)
HTC (59)
LG (80)
Motorola (52)
Nokia (40)
Samsung (126)
Sony (33)

Subscribe to our Newsletter: